Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Consortium

Overview

The Problem

The critical need for accurately measuring the health status of clinical trial participants directly and without influence continues to rise in importance to both regulators and patients themselves. The ever-expanding use of electronic methods to capture patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and other clinical outcome assessment (COA) data, alongside passive, digitally derived data via digital health technologies (DHTs), has established technology as a powerful and multi-faceted tool in capturing the patient experience in medical and therapeutic development.

Alongside those technologies, there are a range of approaches taken by different stakeholders to justify use, implementation, and oversight of these systems, which introduces inefficiency and instability to the clinical trial process. Singular, siloed approaches that lack standardization, alignment with regulatory expectations, and adherence to established best practices present risks to trial execution and, ultimately, the development of new and effective medicines and treatments. There is a tangible need, recognized by regulators and electronic COA (eCOA) providers alike, to develop the standards, resources, education and best practices to drive efficient use of these systems.

The Solution

The eCOA Consortium is powered by providers of eCOA technologies and allied services who support the collection of COA and DHT-derived data in clinical trials. These industry leaders work in a pre-competitive environment in which a critical mass of experts can collaborate to develop standards, conduct research, design and deliver educational opportunities, and define the best practices for the electronic collection of COA and DHT-derived data. The eCOA Consortium serves the clinical research community as the definitive resource for authoritative, consensus-developed resources to support eCOA usage. The Consortium works closely with other stakeholders, such as clinical trial sponsors from the PRO Consortium and the Rare Disease COA Consortium and regulators, with the overarching aim of enhancing public health by optimizing the quality and value of COA/DHT-derived data in medical evaluation and clinical decision-making.

The Impact

The impact of the eCOA Consortium’s work is improved quality, practicality, and acceptability of electronic capture of clinical trial endpoint data. Since its inception in 2011, the eCOA Consortium members have produced, or collaborated with colleagues to produce, the following educational resources for sponsors and eCOA providers:

  • Six best practices white papers
  • 21 webinars
  • 20 peer-reviewed publications
  • 10 poster presentations
  • 20 podium presentations

More information about these resources can be found here.

To learn more about eCOA, contact us at ecoac@c-path.org or subscribe to our updates here.

Resources

Publications/White Papers/GBTI* Resources Library FAQ Icon

*eCOA: Getting Better Together Initiative (GBTI), which ran from 2019 to 2024

  • Click here to view the closeout Press Release
  • Click here to view the final quarterly update (Q4 2024), which includes details of active projects as of December 31, 2024

 

TitleDescriptionHover DescriptionSource
Publication DateAuthorsGBTI
Link
eCOA LexiconDescriptionWithout a common lexicon among eCOA vendors, sponsors, and regulators, the chance for miscommunication, errors, and inefficiencies increases. The objective of this team is to review the terminology and create an aligned eCOA Lexicon for use by stakeholders across the eCOA ecosystem.C-PathMay 2023GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20241204203508/GBTI_eCOALexicon_v3.pdf
eCOA: Process, Workflow, Roles, Responsibilities (Abbreviations Table)DescriptionDefine an eCOA process and workflow that aligns expectations for successful eCOA strategy development and deployment and clarifies roles and responsibilities.C-PathDecember, 2020GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427173146/GBTI_AbbreviationsTable_v1.pdf
eCOA: Process, Workflow, Roles, Responsibilities(Roles Table)DescriptionDefine an eCOA process and workflow that aligns expectations for successful eCOA strategy development and deployment and clarifies roles and responsibilities.C-PathDecember, 2020GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427173146/GBTI_Roles_Table_v1.pdf
eCOA: Process, Workflow, Roles, Responsibilities(Process Step Table)DescriptionDefine an eCOA process and workflow that aligns expectations for successful eCOA strategy development and deployment and clarifies roles and responsibilities.C-PathDecember, 2020GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427173145/GBTI_Process_StepTable_v1.0.pdf
eCOA: Process, Workflow, Roles, Responsibilities(Process Workflow)DescriptionDefine an eCOA process and workflow that aligns expectations for successful eCOA strategy development and deployment and clarifies roles and responsibilities.C-PathDecember, 2020GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427173144/GBTI_eCOA_Process_Workflow_v1.pdf
Best Practice Recommendations: User Acceptance Testing for Systems Designed to Collect Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ElectronicallyArticleThis article provides best practice recommendations for user acceptance testing to support a high-quality eCOA system and ensure reliable and more complete data are collected during the study.Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceMarch 1, 2022Gordon S, Crager J, Howry C, Barsdorf AI, Cohen J, Crescioni M, Dahya B, Delong P, Knaus C, Reasner DS, Vallow S, Zarzar K, Eremenco S
Yeshttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43441-021-00363-z
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Dataset Structure and Standardization to Support Drug DevelopmentArticleThis article discusses best practice recommendations covering the application of CDISC standards for ePRO Datasets, the involvement of key stakeholders, and strategies to manage ePRO dataset content, quality control, and validation.Value in HealthAugust 2023Hudgens S, Kern S, Barsdorf AI, Cassells S, Rowe A, King-Kallimanis BL, Coon C, Low G, Eremenco SYeshttps://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(23)00060-8/fulltext?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1098301523000608?showall=true
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ChangesArticleThis article presents key best practices that are aligned to the latest health authority guidance. From 2018 to 2022, 45 representatives of C-Path’s Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, eCOA Consortium, and the eClinical Forum collaborated to develop guidelines on changes to eCOA data. The resulting core principles can become the foundation upon which sponsors, investigators, and eCOA providers can evaluate and manage data change requests.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data ManagementDecember 14, 2023Delong P, Humler D, Haag T, Yeomans A, Andrus J, Eremenco S, Finan A, Gable J, Gilfillan D, Howry C, Kern S, Lesniewski S, Simpliciano K, Staunton H, Turnbull J, Workman C, Raymond SYeshttps://www.jscdm.org/article/id/249/
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ChangesWebinarThis webinar provides key best practices of electronic clinical outcome assessment data changes that are aligned to the latest health authority guidance. It is based on the article published on December 14, 2023, in the Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management. C-PathFebruary 6, 2024Delong P, Humler D, Yeomans AYeshttps://youtu.be/5PX6sfXPg8U
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ChangesPost-Webinar Q&AProvides answers to questions that were received during the Q&A portion of the webinar but not answered due to time limitations. The webinar provided best practices of electronic clinical outcome assessment data changes that are aligned to the latest health authority guidance. It is based on the article published on December 14, 2023, in the Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management. C-PathFebruary 6, 2024GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240510123257/eCOADataChanges-PostWebinarQA.pdf
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ChangesSlidesThe slide deck presented during the webinar on February 6, 2024. The webinar provided best practices of electronic clinical outcome assessment data changes that are aligned to the latest health authority guidance. It is based on the article published on December 14, 2023, in the Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management. C-PathFebruary 6, 2024GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427170529/eCOADataChanges_FINAL-2.pdf
Flexible approaches to eCOA administration in clinical trials: The site perspectiveArticleThis article presents the results of a survey of eCOA-experienced clinical trial sites to understand their challenges and gather suggestions for simplification that may result in a more flexible, participant- and site-centric approach to ePRO implementation in clinical trials.Contemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsDecember 7, 2023Haenel E, Elash C, Garner K, Turner M, Kern S on behalf of the Electronic Clinical Outcome (eCOA) Consortium and the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) ConsortiumYeshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865423001874?via=ihub
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)PodcastThis podcast provides an exploration of the conceptual challenges around BYOD adoption.C-PathApril, 2022Steele S, Kern SYeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHu6XbKTo9o
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)WebinarThis webinar highlights the key recommendations to enable successful BYOD implementation.C-PathJuly 18, 2024Dumais K, McEvoy K, Romero H, Barden CYeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DILxBKJSJvI
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)Guide SlidesThese guide slides provide a more detailed version of the webinar slides with more granular recommendations.C-PathJuly 18, 2024GBTI TeamYeshttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240726132856/GBTI-BYOD-Webinar-GuideSlides.pdf
Conflicting Terminology in Digital Health Space: A Call for ConsensusApplied Clinical TrialsFebruary 15, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/conflicting-terminology-in-digital-health-space-a-call-for-consensus
First-hand Perspectives on Achieving True Digital Health EngagementApplied Clinical TrialsDecember 2, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/first-hand-perspectives-on-achieving-true-digital-health-engagement
Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: quantitative study findingsJournal of Patient-Reported OutcomesNovember 26, 2022Stacie Hudgens, Louise Newton, Sonya Eremenco, Mabel Crescioni, Tara Symonds, Philip C. G. Griffiths, David S. Reasner, Bill Byrom, Paul O’Donohoe, Susan Vallow on behalf of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium and Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) ConsortiumNohttps://jpro.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41687-022-00521-3
Implementing Numeric Rating and Visual Analog Scales in an eCOA SolutionApplied Clinical TrialsNovember 10, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/implementing-numeric-rating-and-visual-analog-scales-in-an-ecoa-solution
Survey Investigates Backup Solution Adoption for ePRO SystemsApplied Clinical TrialsOctober 14, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/survey-investigates-backup-solution-adoption-for-epro-systems
Evaluating the Use of Backup Solutions for ePRO SystemsApplied Clinical TrialsSeptember 7, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/evaluating-the-use-of-backup-solutions-for-epro-systems
Measurement Comparability of Electronic and Paper Administration of Visual Analogue Scales: A Review of Published StudiesTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceFebruary 10, 2022Byrom B, Elash CA, Eremenco S, Bodart S, Muehlhausen W, Platko JV, Watson C, Howry CNohttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-022-00376-2
Comparability of a Provisioned Device Versus Bring Your Own Device for Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Interview FindingsJournal of Patient-Reported OutcomesApril 4, 2022Newton L, Knight-West O, Eremenco S, Hudgens S, Crescioni M, Symonds T, Reasner DS, Byrom B, O’Donohoe P, Vallow S on behalf of the Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium and the Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment ConsortiumNohttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00492-5
Progressing BYOD AdoptionApplied Clinical TrialsJune 4, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/progressing-byod-adoption
Administering Complex Cognitive Tests Remotely in The Cognitively-ImpairedApplied Clinical TrialsJune 7, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/administering-complex-cognitive-tests-remotely-in-the-cognitively-impaired
The Power of Collaboration: Introducing the eCOA ConsortiumApplied Clinical TrialsMay 12, 2022eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/the-power-of-collaboration-introducing-the-ecoa-consortium
Best Practice Recommendations: User Acceptance Testing for Systems Designed to Collect Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ElectronicallyTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceMarch 1, 2022Gordon S, Crager J, Howry C, Barsdorf AI, Cohen J, Crescioni M, Dahya B, Delong P, Knaus C, Reasner DS, Vallow S, Zarzar K, Eremenco SNohttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00363-z
Recommendations for the Electronic Migration and Implementation of Clinician-reported Outcome Assessments in Clinical TrialsValue in HealthApril 1, 2022Romero H, DeBonis D, O’Donohoe P, Wyrwich K, Arnera V, Platko J, Willgoss T, Harris K, Crescioni M, Steele S, Eremenco S, on behalf of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium and the Patient-Reported Outcome ConsortiumNohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.012
Demystifying Submissions of eCOA Documentation for Ethics Review: Are We Making Submissions More Difficult than Necessary?Applied Clinical TrialsAugust 14, 2020Gertel A, Raymond S, Vallow S, Arnera V, Crescioni M, Chassany O, Bodart S, Eremenco SNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/demystifying-submissions-of-ecoa-documentation-for-ethics-review-are-we-making-submissions-more
Agreement Among Paper and Electronic Modes of the EQ-5D-5LThe Patient – Patient-Centered Outcomes ResearchApril 28, 2020Lundy JJ, Coons SJ, Flood E, Patel MJ on behalf of the ePRO ConsortiumNohttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00419-6
Perceived Burden of Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials: Results of a Preliminary Study Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceDecember 23, 2019Bodart S, Byrom B, Crescioni M, Eremenco S, Flood E, on behalf of the ePRO Consortium Nohttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F2168479018788053
Best Practices for Avoiding Paper Backup When Implementing Electronic Approaches to Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical TrialsTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceDecember 23, 2019Howry C, Elash C, Crescioni M, Eremenco S, O’Donohoe P, Rothrock T, on behalf of the ePRO ConsortiumNohttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F2168479018785160
Training on the Use of Technology to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome Data Electronically in Clinical Trials: Best Practice Recommendations from the ePRO ConsortiumTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceDecember 23, 2019Ly J, Crescioni M, Eremenco S, Bodart S, Donoso M, Butler A, Dallabrida S, on behalf of the ePRO ConsortiumNohttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1177/2168479018796206
Selection of and Evidententiary Considerations for Wearable Devices and Their Measurements for Use in Regulatory Decision Making: Recommendations from the ePRO ConsortiumValue in HealthNovember 7, 2017Byrom B, Watson C, Doll H, Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Ballinger R, McCarthy M, Crescioni M, O’Donohoe P, Howry CNohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.012
Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported EndpointsTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceDecember 30, 2015Fleming S, Barsdorf AI, Howry C, O’Gorman H, Coons SJNohttps://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015609102
“Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical TrialsTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceDecember 30, 2015Gwaltney C, Coons SJ, O’Donohoe P, O’Gorman H, Denomey M, Howry C, Ross JNohttps://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015609104
Considerations for Requiring Subjects to Provide a Response to Electronic Patient-reported Outcome InstrumentsTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceOctober 13, 2015Paul O’Donohoe P, Lundy JJ, Gnanasakthy A, Greene ANohttp://dij.sagepub.com/content/49/6/792.short
Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical TrialsThe Patient – Patient-Centered Outcomes ResearchOctober 10, 2014Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Lundy JJ, O’Donohoe P, O’Gorman H, Malizia WNohttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0090-z
ePRO Systems Validation: Clearly Defining the Roles of Clinical Trials Teams and ePRO System ProvidersValue in HealthJune, 2013Coons, SJNohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.006
Best Practices for Participant Registration in Clinical Trials Using Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Technology for Data CollectionWhite PaperApril, 2021eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427170209/BestPractices5_upd-1.pdf
COVID-19: Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Data through Clinical SitesWhite PaperJune 5, 2020eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427170208/COVID-19_CPath_v3.0_2020JUN5-1.pdf
Best Practices for Electronic Implementation of Response Scales for Patient-Reported Outcome MeasuresWhite PaperSeptember, 2018eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/BestPractices2_Response_Scales.pdf
Best Practices for Maximizing Electronic Data Capture Options during the Development of New Patient-Reported Outcome MeasuresWhite PaperSeptember, 2018eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/BestPractices_Maximizing_Data_Capture.pdf
Best Practices for Migrating Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to a New Data Collection ModeWhite PaperSeptember, 2018eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/BestPractices3_Migrating.pdf
eCOA Systems and CE CertificationWhite PaperMarch, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20240427170207/eCOA-Systems-and-CE-Certification-1.pdf
eCOA Systems and the CE Mark: Navigating the RegulationsApplied Clinical TrialsMarch 2, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/ecoa-systems-and-the-ce-mark-navigating-the-regulations
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Dataset Structure and Standardization to Support Drug DevelopmentValue in HealthAugust, 2023Hudgens S, Kern S, Barsdorf AI, Cassells S, Rowe A, King-Kallimanis BL, Coon C, Low G, Eremenco SNohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.011
Data Standards and ePRO Systems: A Road Less Travelled?Applied Clinical TrialsApril 14, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/data-standards-and-epro-systems-a-road-les-travelled
An eCOA Lexicon: The Quest for Single, Trusted Source of TerminologyApplied Clinical TrialsJune 7, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/an-ecoa-lexicon-the-quest-for-single-trusted-source-of-terminology
eCOA Systems and Intended Use: Key ConsiderationsApplied Clinical TrialsSeptember 7, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/ecoa-systems-and-intended-use-key-considerations
Training the Raters: An Important Factor in Clinical Trial SuccessApplied Clinical TrialsOctober 13, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/training-the-raters-an-important-factor-in-clinical-trial-success
The First eCOA Forum Examines BYOD and Item SkippingApplied Clinical TrialsAugust 11, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/the-first-ecoa-forum-examines-byod-and-item-skipping
A New and Comprehensive Guide to ePRO Migration and ImplementationApplied Clinical TrialsNovember 14, 2023eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/a-new-and-comprehensive-guide-and-epro-migration-and-implementation
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Data ChangesJournal of the Society for Clinical Data ManagementDecember 14, 2023Delong P, Humler D, Haag T, Yeomans A, Andrus J, Eremenco S, Finan A, Gable J, Gilfillan D, Howry C, Kern S, Lesniewski S, Simpliciano K, Staunton H, Turnbull J, Workman C, Raymond S.Nohttps://doi.org/10.47912/jscdm.249
Flexible Approaches to eCOA Administration in Clinical Trials: The Site PerspectiveContemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsDecember 7, 2023Haenel E, Elash C, Garner K, Turner M, Kern S on behalf of the Electronic Clinical Outcome (eCOA) Consortium and the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) ConsortiumNohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101241
Best Practices for the Electronic Implementation and Migration of Patient-Reported Outcome MeasuresValue in HealthOctober 23, 2023Mowlem F, Elash CA, Dumais KM, Newara MC, Kern S on behalf of the Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment ConsortiumNohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.007
Unstructured Patient Diaries: To be, or not to be, that is the QuestionApplied Clinical TrialsApril 18, 2024eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/unstructured-patient-diaries-to-be-or-not-to-be-that-is-the-question
Implementing Sensor-based Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Trials: key Considerations from the eCOA ConsortiumClinical and Translational ScienceNovember 3, 2024eCOA ConsortiumNohttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.70054
Best Practices for Electronic Migration and Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures – Condensed VersionSummaryC-PathJune 17, 2025eCOA ConsortiumNohttps://media.c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/20250626215056/BPforMIofPROMS_Condensed_v1.0_20250617.pdf

Newsletters and Webinars

Looking for recent eCOA newsletter and webinars? Click here.

Team

C-Path Personnel

Scottie Kern
Executive Director, eCOA Consortium

Pamela Dasher, MLS
Senior Project Manager

Alisa Heinzman, MFA
Senior Project Manager

Janelle Russell
Senior Project Coordinator

Sarah David, MPH
Associate Director, Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Program

Cheryl D. Coon, PhD
Vice President, Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Program

Industry Co-Director

Karl McEvoy, PhD
Vice President eCOA and Patient Technology, YPrime

Contact Us

Recent News

Events

Publications

Podcasts